A Bitcoin user recently committed a jaw-dropping blunder, paying a $105,000 fee for a measly $10 transfer. The mistake happened when they attached 0.99 BTC instead of the typical sub-$3 fee—a 10,500% markup on the standard rate. Oops. The windfall went straight to MARA mining pool, who (surprise!) didn’t complain about the unexpected payday. Unlike bank transfers, crypto transactions are irreversible. This isn’t even crypto’s costliest slip-up.
While most people struggle to scrape together a few bucks for coffee, one unfortunate Bitcoin user managed to lose $105,000 in a single transaction. The blunder occurred when they transferred a mere 0.00010036 BTC (about $10) to Kraken but accidentally attached a fee of nearly 0.99 BTC. That’s 99 times more than the actual amount sent. Talk about a typo that hurts.
The massive overpayment went straight to MARA mining pool. Lucky them. The fee was completely unnecessary since average Bitcoin transaction costs typically sit below $3 – sometimes under a dollar. But hey, who doesn’t enjoy paying a 10,500% markup?
Mining pools hitting the jackpot while users hemorrhage money. Welcome to crypto, where your typos cost more than a luxury car.
This isn’t even crypto’s most expensive mistake. One user coughed up 83.65 BTC (approximately $3.1 million) in 2023, and another paid a jaw-dropping $24 million Ethereum fee in 2021. Someone else threw away 19 BTC (roughly $510,000) to move $2,000 in September 2025. These people would definitely win at a “who had the worst day” contest.
Most of these costly errors stem from manual wallet configuration. Users panic during network congestion and jack up fees to speed things along. Or they just mess up the decimal point. Classic human error. Sometimes buggy software is to blame, but usually it’s just people being careless. The incident highlights serious usability issues in wallet platforms that continue to plague the cryptocurrency ecosystem.
The tragedy? Bitcoin transactions are irreversible. Once those fees are gone, they’re gone. Mining pools rarely refund excessive payments unless they’re feeling unusually generous. MARA Pool certainly didn’t complain about their unexpected windfall. In cases like the 19 BTC fee incident, some mining pools like F2Pool may offer a temporary holding period for users to reclaim excessive fees.
Wallet interfaces don’t help matters. Many lack safeguards or warnings before letting users set ridiculous fees. No “Are you sure you want to pay 10,000 times the normal amount?” pop-up in sight. Using a hardware wallet for cryptocurrency storage could potentially prevent such costly mistakes by providing additional verification steps.
